That depends on your point of view.  I will say I  have not dug very deeply, but I do know you get more consistant numbers  with Eli than you do Romo.  Romo seems to have those 3-4 huge weeks  that puts his total pts up.  In every league I was in last year, Eli  scored more than Romo, and was much more consistant than Romo was.
Now I don't say elite, and if I did I agree I was wrong.  I do say in my  mind Eli is the much safer and more productive starter than Romo,  fantasy or otherwise.
		
		
	 
Good points on all fronts, consistency  is very important IMO and could sway this one way or the other......but  since I never take anything at face value 

......let's take a look to  see if Eli really is the more consistent option:
2012: 4 pt per passing TD league
Bad 0-10 pt - Eli 1; 
Romo 2*
OK 10.1 - 15 pt - 
Eli 3; Romo 2
Good 15.1 - 20 pt - 
Eli 5; Romo 4
Very GD 20.1 - 25 pt - Eli 4; 
Romo 6
Great 25 pt + - 
Eli 3; Romo 2
*Includes wk 16 injury when he only had 2 attempts
**Neither QB had a 30+ pt effort last year to inflate overall numbers
OK, so there are the raw numbers. Let's do some grouping here. Both  Eli and Manning had 25% of their games in the bad or OK categories. A  respectable number. Eli actually edged out Romo in the great game area  that kinda disproved the argument that Romo pads his overall stats with  3-4 huge weeks. Where Romo's value lies is his 38% in the Very Good  category. His 6 games there combined with his great games gives you 50%  of his games played at 20 pts or higher, just edging out Eli's 7. Both  had the same number of 15+ pt games at 12.
The real difference in  their numbers last year kinda boils down to 1 week, Romo only had 2  attempts in week 16 (assuming injury here) and took a 0. With just an OK  effort, his totals would have been identical with Eli.
Consistency  to me also included 2 other areas. How long have you performed at this  level and injury history, how consistent are you on the field.
Let's  tackle the easy one first: Injury history - Clear edge to Eli. Elie is  consistently on the field more than Romo. Over the last 5 years Romo has  missed 13 games (16%) (plus the 0 he took last yr in wk 16). Eli has  not missed a game. Clear edge to Eli.
Year to year consistency -  How long have they done it at this level. To do this, let's look at  their rank in pts per game over the last 5 years:
2007 - Eli 14th (13.2 pts) 
Romo 2nd (19.8 pts)
2008 - Eli 18th (13.2 pts) 
Romo 6th (17.4 pts)
2009 - Eli 14th (15.9 pts) 
Romo 7th (18.0 pts)
2010 - Eli 15th (16.4 pts) 
Romo 8th (17.7 pts)
2011 - 
Eli 6th (18.9 pts) Romo 7th (18.1 pts)
Here  you have a clear advantage to Romo. Outside of his career year in 2007  he has 4 straight years where he has finished between 6th and 8th in  ppg. Before last year, Eli had finished no higher than 14th in that same  stat. Romo has performed more consistently over the past 5 years than  Eli on a season to season basis.
So in terms of consistency, the  facts just don't back up the claim here unless I am missing something  hidden in the stats. Romo's FANTASY performances last year are just as  consistent as Eli on a game to game basis. Romo is also the much more  safer option in terms of year to year performance. He has performed at  the level he was at last year for a MUCH longer time than Eli. Eli has  had 1 very good year and a whole lot of OK years. Has he turned the  corner? Maybe, but his track record is just 1 year at that production  level. Where Eli does have a clear edge is reliability. He is always on  the field. Romo has been more prone to injury over the last 5 seasons.
So reliability - edge to Eli. Romo has some injury risk.
Consistency  when they play, Romo is the more proven, safer performer and just as  consistent game to game even when comparing Eli's career year.
Again,  have to ingnore the NFL QB value and concentrate on the Fantasy QB  value when looking at these two. It's easy to overvalue Eli due to the  value he has for his team. But unfortunatley you don't score any fantasy  points for that.