Joe Webb (qb,wr)

#1bears fan

#1bears fan

New Member
With his dual designation is he worth a start in my WR2 spot?? I have Jennings normally but with no Rodgers I'll be going Britt, Mason or Thomas. Risky play against Chicago but I have no info on this guy. If Chicago continues to play there deep cover 2 a new QB should be able to at least throw short passes and maybe a TD or 2. Thoughts........:headscratch:
 
as you saw I was thinking the same... I'm actually leaning toward playing him over Marshall rather than Williams(SEA)... I think It's going to be a Sunday decision though.
 
I hear ya.. with the DEF the bears have been playing They give up alot of short stuff and if they change it up and pressure him the kid can run!
 
Another reason i hate yahoo leagues....they are the only website to leave this cheapshit out there....but that is the rules. Even a poor QB has a shot to put up 10-15 pts pretty easily.
 
Miller said:
Another reason i hate yahoo leagues....they are the only website to leave this cheapshit out there....but that is the rules. Even a poor QB has a shot to put up 10-15 pts pretty easily.
Click to expand...

I completely agree Miller. I actually called out my friend for putting him in his starting lineup. I never agreed with the dual roles. They are one or the other. I think it is completely cheap to use a player like that. Never agreed with Woodhead or McCluster with those dual roles. But I guess since it is listed that way it is not illegal. Just a cheap way to try and win a playoff game.
 
Trickster said:
I completely agree Miller. I actually called out my friend for putting him in his starting lineup. I never agreed with the dual roles. They are one or the other. I think it is completely cheap to use a player like that. Never agreed with Woodhead or McCluster with those dual roles. But I guess since it is listed that way it is not illegal. Just a cheap way to try and win a playoff game.
Click to expand...

What part of playing completely within the rules of the game is "cheap"? I am playing Webb in every one of my yahoo leagues (Except one; but thats a super shallow league).

back to original post, I play Britt - Webb - JENNINGS. He had a 50+ yard TD bomb that he dropped. I just would find it tough to bench him with his 11 TDs for Mike, who has 3 and one being a fluke?
 
I don't think a player should be listed as 2 positions. They are either one or the other. I agree, it is not illegal and it is within the rules, therefore I am not making a big stink about it. I am just stating my opinion, thats all.
 
I picked up Webb in my Yahoo league as well. Normally I start Welker and Boldin, but Boldin has been taking a back seat to Mason the last few weeks. Do you think starting Webb over Boldin is a big risk?? I don't. Even if he only has 100 yds passing and 50 yds rushing, that's still 10 points and if he can get just one td.....OR it's at least possible that he has a real nice game and gets 20+ points. Plus if does well he could end up winning you the title week 17 when the Vikes play Detroit.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! I love it. I dont understand how its cheap?? If he wasnt playing against Chicago he would be one of the most added players this week. I picked him up and have him in my starting lineup, now leaving it that way is another story but it sure has everyone bitching and moaning about my team instead of worrying about theirs. Most dual designation players suck fantasy wise, Woodhead being the exception and even he is a flex option at best. :stirpot: Well if it bites me in the Butt and I lose at least I still won the highest total points money, right Miller. :hug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top