Going Forward - Which QB?
- Thread starter mills
- Start date
I dont' trust Garrard or his team any farther than I can throw them.
McNabb will continue to start, but using what targets?
Fitz is locked in at starter, but I don't know he is a consistant fantasy pt getter.
so where would I rank them?
McNabb
then Fitz
then Garrard
Vicious_Machine
New Member
Fitz just slightly ahead of Garrard.
and farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr at the bottom: McNabb
McNabb has 7 TDs this year. And has 0 games with more then 1 TD. eeww??
The problem with Garrard is, hit & miss. 3 games with 3 or more TDs, 2 games with no TDs. So I would personally like Fitz, who has TDs every game, and generally multi-TDs game.
and farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr at the bottom: McNabb
McNabb has 7 TDs this year. And has 0 games with more then 1 TD. eeww??
The problem with Garrard is, hit & miss. 3 games with 3 or more TDs, 2 games with no TDs. So I would personally like Fitz, who has TDs every game, and generally multi-TDs game.
cctekguy
Staff member
Fitz couldn't beat out Edwards for the starting job. He's the benefactor of teams looking beyond them to their next game.
Garrard (as previously mentioned) is erratic.
Nabbs is the seasoned professional on a marginally decent team.
Nabbs 1st, Fitz last, Garrard 2nd by default.
Garrard (as previously mentioned) is erratic.
Nabbs is the seasoned professional on a marginally decent team.
Nabbs 1st, Fitz last, Garrard 2nd by default.
Vicious_Machine
New Member
McNabb has 7 TDs in 8 games. Fitz has 12 TDs in 5 starts.
"He's the benefactor of teams looking beyond them to their next game."
How is that an argument AGAINST Fitz in FF?????? So teams were looking past them before when they were 0-3? But now that they are 0-7, teams will take them seriously?????
"He's the benefactor of teams looking beyond them to their next game."
How is that an argument AGAINST Fitz in FF?????? So teams were looking past them before when they were 0-3? But now that they are 0-7, teams will take them seriously?????
maverick824
Well-Known Member
at this point in the year, i'm looking at their potential playoff schedules....if you have a QB carousel, you simply can NOT overlook the value of an avg QB vs a weak pass D(ranked 20th or worse)......so let's look...
McNabb - Only weak pass left in reg is TEN....playoff schedule is yuck city with TB(6) and DAL(7)....title game would be JAX(27)
Fitz - Faces avg D's all the way, playoffs look great with CLE(26), MIA(17), and NE(30)
Garrard - Faces 3 weak D's the rest of the way(HOU, CLE, TEN), with 2 top 5 d's to avoid. Playoffs look avg with OAK(5), IND(14), WAS(31)
I'd play matchup w Garrard and Fitz, using Garrard's cupcakes, and start Fitz in the playoffs.
McNabb - Only weak pass left in reg is TEN....playoff schedule is yuck city with TB(6) and DAL(7)....title game would be JAX(27)
Fitz - Faces avg D's all the way, playoffs look great with CLE(26), MIA(17), and NE(30)
Garrard - Faces 3 weak D's the rest of the way(HOU, CLE, TEN), with 2 top 5 d's to avoid. Playoffs look avg with OAK(5), IND(14), WAS(31)
I'd play matchup w Garrard and Fitz, using Garrard's cupcakes, and start Fitz in the playoffs.
Vicious_Machine
New Member
good point Mav, if I could stream Garrard & Fitz based on matchups, I would do that.
Especially when Garrard plays Washington. Any time you can get a QB vs Jags-Houston-Washington, it needs to be considered.
Especially when Garrard plays Washington. Any time you can get a QB vs Jags-Houston-Washington, it needs to be considered.
storminn0rm
Brewmaster
I think McNugget had a huge game last year the game after being benched.
gonna change here.
I will go Fitz then McNabb then Garrard.
Garrard just sucks, and McNabb now is in Shanny's dog house.