Search results

I would like to see Seattle take a look at Kolb. Hasselbeck should be done after this season. Whitehurst looked good against the Rams Week 17, but that's the only game he's looked that good in, and.. it was against the Rams. I think Kolb could work well in Seattle.

Hahaha not quite. I wasn't trying to say that his recovery wouldn't be a good one.

I know it's a crazy longshot, but how's this for a weird scenario? If another upset happens, and the Packers win as well, Seattle will host Green Bay for the NFC Championship. How ridiculous is that?

I mean it seems like the majority rules here, but I gotta agree.. It's gotta be Al Davis.

Man.. a torn meniscus sucks. I tore up my knee junior year of high school, had pain for about a year and a half, and it's never been the same again. I can't imagine playing at his level with that pain.

I gotta hope the Hawks beat the spread.

I was surprised at how bad the officiating was on both sides. I was also surprised at how well the Seahawks defense actually did. Granted, it was against the Rams, but it was a solid showing for what they were up against.

Thanks Dawgs!

Son of a... I just drafted him in Renegades... I hope he's alright.

And a TD.

I would've bet Heyward Bey if he was available. :)

"The receiver can't catch the ball if the quarterback doesn't throw it to him." "What they want to do on this play is get the ball into the end zone." "If the running back doesn't find the gap, he can't get through." "Boom!" Good riddance.

Agreed. I don't think you could argue anything different than that.

I take that back.. If he had a threat at RB and a better O-Line, he would have way more of a chance to succeed at QB. He hasn't been given that chance lately. But he has also been looking worse, imo, in situations where he hasn't been rushed. And, having not seen him play after his injury, I am...

Oh I know that the whole team is worse, but I think that Hass has as equal a part of the blame as anyone else.

I just don't understand how you could be so dumb to jeopardize your career like that.

I agree that he was a lousy QB, but I disagree that teams wouldn't be better off. I'm saying (I'll use Seattle cause I know more about them than other teams) that Hasselbeck had been getting worse and worse BEFORE his injury, so who knows how he will play now, and our best backup is SENECA...

I'm a little surprised with the resounding 'no's. I mean, some teams don't need a new QB at all, but some teams (Seattle, Detroit, etc.) who need (or at least should think about a change) a new/better QB, and Vick would be that answer. Sure, his talent may have decayed in prison, but he's still...

Wow, this is incredible news for Chicago! On a side note... I did love the email getting the breaking news.. I think that would be a nice touch for huge stories like this in the future. :thumbsup:

Wow.. that's a great question! I mean, I think the risk is the same for each of them. Stafford: you don't know how he'll fare in the NFL. Vick: you don't know what new trouble he'll get into. My money'd be on Vick, if I was forced to make that choice.