Search results

4 of 5 top 5 picks from 2017 do not get their 5th year option. Myles Garrett is the only one. Trubisky, Soloman Thomas (SF), Fournette (Jax) and Corey Davis

LOL - so Kelce and Rudolph are on par based on that logic? Not a fan of the Kmet pick for the Bears. I really wanted them to address the line as a priority as that is the biggest weakness of the team.

Here ya go boss https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-draft-2020-live-trade-details-day-3/lv54elmbd8xm1lnkoal477pom

Maybe Jamie’s will learn a thing or two from Brees. I remain not seeing Taysom as anything more than a gadget player - great athlete but no more than an NFL backup.

A closer look at the contract details and it isn't as bad as it seems (as usual) - Christian McCaffrey He will count 33M against the cap over the next 3 years (2020 - 2022) - 11M is good value for these prime years. Then they could potentially release him in 2023 with an 8M dead cap # This...

The deal replaces the last 2 years on his rookie deal Phic doesn’t it?

Bears claim they want to use a TE but Trey was Mr Glass

It would more depend on the league rules and the make up of your team more than the value of Bell. I would consider him a fringe starter \ RB3 at this point but maybe you can afford to give him up without affecting your starting lineup. Possibly you need him as a core player. Hard to say - #8...

I don't blame RBs for hold outs. They get screwed by the system given their short careers. Hold out in year 3 of the rookie deal is the only way the stars can really cash in.

From Rotoworld: Per The Athletic's Jourdan Rodrigue, Rhule believes "effectively using McCaffrey as a weapon does not mean leaving him on the field the entire game." McCaffrey played 1,039 snaps last season, which is practically unheard of in this day and age. It was 102 more than runner up...

Looking at the $ it also doesn't make sense as of now. He was due 3M this year and then I think 17 as a 5th year option so 20M over 2 years. Adding a 6th year under a franchise tag would also be "normal" so call it a 10M cap hit each year. Under this deal, they pay 16M per year and have a heavy...

Its win win either way imo. They either get 3 or 4 1st rounders and still get the QB of the present \ future with one of them or you get Burrows. It comes down to where you think Burrows is closer to a lock while Tua or Hebert you just aren't interested in.

There are always amendments that need to be reviewed and agreed by both sides.

He has to have CTE. Not as common with WRs but the signs are there. This doesn't end well.

Is Burrows the best, most guaranteed qb prospect since ... Luck? I would say yes - looking at the last 8 years, all 1st round QBs had some questions. Several went 1 overall but they weren't considered mortal locks to succeed.

4 1sts + Tua as one of the picks - Is there a Bengal fan in here doing this mock? I like the deal but wow!

No one is paying a 2nd round pick for Dalton. He is more in the Foles tier with a 4th or 5th round value. I think the Pats also have enough hubris to just go with Stidham and Hoyer.

Re Cooks, high salary with limited production is the current reason - not sure why no team wants him for more than a year or two

Bears signing Tyler bray is a thumbs down. Might mean they do not draft a QB dont know who Germain Ifedi is but they need offensive line as the priority so thumbs up there.

I can see the pats with no big names QBs and going with Stidham and maybe a josh Rosen type. Why bring in dalton or some older mediocre player like that? edit. Auto correct played havoc with my original post above and I didn’t notice.