According to Roto:
"Steve Smith was forced to leave Thursday's practice after straining his pectoral muscle reaching for the ball.
Beat writer Mike Garafolo notes that Smith tried to continue but was unable to practice through the injury. There's no word on the severity just yet, but Smith...
I felt as though I had dept at rb: Peterson, Benson, Blount, Lynch, F.Jones, and Forte
My WR's at the time were: Desean, S.Smith (nyg), Santonio Holmes, M.Williams (sea)...
oh and I just snagged up V.Jackson off waivers (somehow he was dropped)..
Once I put the new rule in, the same trade was made to me so I accepted...
And this is when it got veto'd again... and once again with no explanation, at which point i msgd the league asking someone, anyone to give one decent reason... and still no response...
So what do you think ?
I posted a Commish note stating that any trades from here on out that get veto'd for any reason need to be givin a justification from any one of the players who veto'd...
If not jutification is given then I will push the trade through...
Same rule applies to my recent trade...
Am I...
I reiceved a trade: I give up Forte to recieve Austin...
Austin clearly isn't as good w/romo out and Forte is just inconsistent ...
I am the commish in the league, and it feels as though the league is vetoing just to stop other teams from gaining any comptetition against them...
whats...
Have a trade offer.... I get Austin for giving up Forte...
Team is listed below:
QB:Vick / Stafford
RB: Peterson, Forte, Lynch, Benson, F.Jones, Blount
WR: Fitz, S.Smith (NYG), S.Holmes, M.Williams (Sea)
TE: Celek, Moeaki
I'm thinking of picking up Jahvid Best from another player and have the above mentioned on my team...
Are any worth trading to get Best: Also this should be a resonable trade as If I try to lowball the other player it will get Veto'd anyways...
What do you think?