There are reports out there that this is a real possibility. I can't see it happening. Can you?
He didn't trade Jimmy...Kraft did. Bill was furious, and that's why this has become a rumor.No. If he was leaving NE, he wouldn’t have traded Garoppolo to an NFC team.
Just don’t see him leaving the Pats. Will be watching their draft closely this year. If they grab a QB in the first two rounds, he has long term plans to keep coaching. If not, he will go when Brady goes.
He didn't trade Jimmy...Kraft did. Bill was furious, and that's why this has become a rumor.
after being given instructions to trade him
For the record, the story states he dictated the trade of Garoppolo due to getting value for a QB they won't be carrying in the future, nothing to do with TB12, more to do with full support ONLY for Brady. Now that being said, Kraft also is a bit of a power mind, and he might have taken offense at Garp passing on offers to hang around instead of starting somewhere else.This cracks me up. Wickersham decides to dig because he saw the timing of the Garropolo trade as odd. Talks to "staff" with no quotes, not even anonymous, and speculates. And now everyone thinks the Pats are unraveling. Sounds like a lot of wishful thinking more than anything.
Kraft is one of the best owners in pro sports because he lets the football people make the football decisions. Does anyone honestly think he dictated any football move to BB? And when has BB ever let anyone dictate to him? I think there is a 0% chance Kraft made BB trade Garropolo.
I do believe that TB12's witch doctor was causing friction. And BB dictated he was gone.
Funny. If Kraft dictated the Garropolo trade to appease TB12, why would he have let BB send his personal doctor out the door. I'll tell you why, because Wickersham's speculation was way overblown... Lol
Ask the Jets :dunno:Also, why in the world would be to somewhere else to coach? Risk his legacy, start over? Makes no sense.
But come on JScott, don't fall too far into the roses, there are documented accounts of offers of 1st round picks for Garp in the off season, and instead they take a 2nd rounder?
But come on JScott, don't fall too far into the roses, there are documented accounts of offers of 1st round picks for Garp in the off season, and instead they take a 2nd rounder?
I don't have the time to look, but I know I read an article with Hugh that stated they offered at least one first round pick for Garp. Rumor was NE was holding out for 2 which no way was Cleveland doing. It wasn't only Cleveland after Garp also. Nor was it only San Fran.Documented account of offers? Lot of speculation based on what the Pats were supposedly wanting for him or what they could get for him, but I never saw article saying what the actual offers were. Looked and couldn't find anything concrete other than articles saying "the Browns offered more than SF did" which are a dime a dozen.
If they offered "more" than a 2nd before the 2017 draft, that would be more believable. His value was higher then than midway through the 2017 season, when he was only a half season away from free agency instead of having a full season of playing time. A lot of people were calling SF foolish for making the deal due to this. Of course, after watching him for 5 games, his value is through the roof.
I still find it hard to believe that Belichick would have rejected the Browns if they had offered Houston #1 instead of their 2nd. With only a spot of two difference, it made sense to trade Garropolo out of the AFC and to a team that he considered a better opportunity for a player he developed and had an obvious respect for.
I don't have the time to look, but I know I read an article with Hugh that stated they offered at least one first round pick for Garp. Rumor was NE was holding out for 2 which no way was Cleveland doing. It wasn't only Cleveland after Garp also. Nor was it only San Fran.